Why do we consider what foreigner's do is a modern approach?
People say that by incorporating kiss in movies is an modern approach then why if we don't kiss onscreen is consider as modern approach.
for e.g. First humans used to live without clothes and later on they started wearing clothes to cover oneself.. so at that point wearing clothes to cover oneself was a modern opproach and cosidered as the phase of development. And some are wearing revealing clothes and gradually it is becoming smaller and smaller and one day again back to basic no clothes and they name it as modernity. For early humans covering oneself was called modernity and for coming generation wearing less clothes is called modernity just because foreigners are doing so. Why not the foreigners consider themselves to be modern by stopping kiss in their movies? Why we are following them in everything why can't they follow us?
We were the first one to stay in two to three storeyed housing blocks/building in Indus Valley era 3300–1300 BC, 2600–1900 BC and that time these so could foreigners used to stay in caves, tents and on top of tree.
excavated ruins of mohenjo-daro
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/c/c1/Indusvalleyexcavation.jpg
A computer-generated reconstruction has brought a small area of Mohenjo-daro back to life. (Lost Civilizations by Austen Atkinson, p. 179 - 188)
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/d/dc/Mohenjodaro_computergeneratedimage1.jpg
We should understand that foreigner's are ones who are giving our things back to us. We had suniya before them and later on they came up with another name for it as zero. English was derived from and Latin was developed from Brahmi, which even Ashoka used to use at his time so that means as those days we were more modern then them. Brahmi scripts have similar letters to Latin and to some extent to English not the nonsense devnagri that we are using today to write Hindi. We could conclude that English indirectly originated from Brahmi.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/36/Brahmi.png
We want to follow those racist blondes who consider them as one of the higher living beings in this world who tag us a makaka and they call black skinned as negroes. Why can't we tag them as bleachers(bleachout skins) or goriyas. Even white skin is the deformation of skin pigments just like how colored clothes when they are bleached they become white. The religions existing in the current world none of the religion had the founder as white. Even Jesus was not blonde. Then how only whites are superiors and we have to follow them in each and everything that they do. If we follow something worth for the development of entire human race it is understandable but what the use of following Vulgarity? What good it will do the people? Why do we want to follow them when they learnt everything from us? Those nuts can't even write a simple software programs they can't even solve an algebraic equation and people prefer to be like them. Whatever they have done was always indirectly borrowed from us and they just modified it and claim it.
If incase the Hollywood stops kissing onscreen etc at that time we will stop kissing onscreen stating that we are becoming modern that means only when they do we do hence we wil always remain bollywood (b-grade hollywood) replica of them and not our own identity as Indian film industry.
If want to show such movies then let them show but they should atleast certify it. In this case the certification was U, I repeat it was U not even U/A. Why? and if they would have mentioned it beforehand that we are going to encounter a scene like that then we would with our friends or as a couple and we would have refrained going with children or our parents. But they did not specified it. Most of them went them thinking that they were going to watch an adventurous and even the movie theme itself was quite capable of binging in more audiences even those you prefer strictly clean movie.
If people can accept openess then why they are feel shy of abuses why they don't even include abuses as a modern trend to become more shameless. Even abuses should be incorporated as good words.
While going up and down the city in train many at time we come across people doing **** on the tracks why do we feel embarrassed at that time even that may be a first step to modernization and shameless exposure. People will consider this trend as modern only after foreigner's start doing **** on the track then even we will consider it as an modern approach
From nakedness we started wearing clothes it was modernization.
Now from normal clothes to more advanced somelthing like protective cover type of sci-fi clothes can be considered as modernization and not revealing clothes. Revealing clothes or nakedness are supposed to be categorized as de-modernization.
They kissed was not the fault but certifing it as U was their major mistake. If they would have certified it as A then only few group people would have gone to watch or even we would have kept preferences to select the people with whom we can go to watch the movie.
Agreed that the kiss on a lip was not that hardcore Hollywood smooch but still it was a kiss on a lip.
Kiss is not wrong agreed but it matter where actually one is being kissed. Even parents kiss their children but where they don't kiss on the lip of their child. A father does not goes and kiss his daughter's lips a mother does not goes and kisses her son's lips. A brother does not goes and kisses on his sister's lips. These things if offended are considered as sexual abuses and if offened or not they are still cosidered as immorality.
Kiss whatever you want. Kiss wherever you want. Kiss whomever you want but don't publicize it because for some it might be offending and some might enjoy it like the bihari's and people like Santosh Singh who raped priyadarshi mattoo who always want to seek oppertunity to spoil the life of a girl without even thinking what will be the effect of their action on the life and family of those girls.
If they stopped smoking on the screen then it is injustice to allow onscreen kiss.
Again I repeat it was not fully actors fault. The producers and directors are main responsible of that act rather than only filing case against the actor is of no use. They will have to pin down the producers and directors. They are the one who had insisted them to do so. Even if the scene was not there the film will still had been a major hit no one can refuse this fact because the concept of Dhoom movie series itself unique.
But I still prefer Smita Patil in Mirch Masala than Aish in Dhoom2. Kiss on lips does not proves your acting ability any one can kiss on lip but only few people have the ability to act. I would have prefered Aish doing a old irch Masala kind of movie done smita patil. That movie would have proved her acting skills. She was not able to prove her acting talent in Umrao Jaan so they added this scene in this movie because they doubted that she would not be able to deliver a best acting skill in Dhoom2.
Movies are becoming flops because they lack contents and not because there was no exposure. Earlier days there were good talented script writer like Salim/Javed who were the main Star maker whose scripts established Amitabh Bachchan as a Star. The scripts made by them in those days are still being remade in this generation and still the old movies are being watched. It proves their capability or delivering performance which the current film generation lacks completly they give roles to models who either will do overacting or will do underacting but no one is able to do normal acting. Aditya chopra picked up the theme of Hum Aapke Hai Kaun and then relocated the venue to foreign and made DDLJ and then he comes after long time gives Mohabbatein and bring these nonesenses like Neal and Nikki and consider himself to be the best director and launches his monkey brother who does not has a photogenic looks on top of that who cannot even act nor deliver a dialogue with group of idiots apart from Hrithik he makes Dhoom2.
Don't be under the impressin that Khajurao is our heritage. It is just like a sex novel or the contents of triple x movies displayed or jotted down on the walls by some ultra open section of the society for whom sex was just fun. Sex is phenomenon in which one individual reproduces to continue his species. It is not bad or wrong but it should not be a public display.
If they want to make money let them make. If actors want to expose let them expose and kiss. If they want to make Triple X movies or Seven X movies along with the animals let them do but not in the ones which they are wanting a family audience to see because Dhoom2 they have rated as U so it is obvious that everyone was likely to go to watch it along with the kids and parents. So it is the fault of Aditya Chopra, Yash Chopra and Sanjay Gadhavi. If they want to make cases against them it is well accepted because the actors did not asked the director and producers to put a kissing on the lips scene, there fault was only that they did not opposed such kind of exploitation when every one in here has the right to oppose it. Now a days if a someone eve teases then the girls turn arround and slap and teach them a lesson then was she that helpless to say no to such scene which she used to do earlier. Then how Salman inspite of being a male actor strictly opposes any kiss on the lips so compared to her Salman is a better follower of Indian culture alteast in this context. Not like Aamir who lives his own wife and childrens and marries another one KANK is actually inspired from Aamir Khan's life story.